On May 28, 2014, David Banks published an article on Free The IRP6. 

SUMMARY

I have sought guidance from written opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) related to the handling of our case by government officials in Colorado.  Opinions from the Supreme Court substantiates that the IRP6 have suffered numerous constitutional violations as both the accused and as private citizen as it relates to concealing and denying access to court transcripts. SCOTUS opined that the IRP6’s First, Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights have been violated. Let’s review their findings together.

The Sixth Amendment reads “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and PUBLIC trial. The Court Reporter’s Act is rooted in the Sixth Amendment given that the court reporter is required under the act to promptly “file [original shorthand notes and original records] with the clerk of court who…